The interactions among cultures, economies, and civilizations have been changed by globalization. Though it is sometimes given credit for encouraging economic expansion and development, it has also helped to create major differences in wealth and power. The link between globalization and inequality is investigated in this article together with how globalization may worsen economic differences, the historical context around this phenomena, prominent philosophers, and the many points of view resulting from these dynamics.
One cannot talk about globalization without acknowledging its main characteristics. Driven by technological innovations and economic policies advocating free trade, globalization is the flow of products, services, knowledge, and people across national borders. Different countries have entered world markets, which has resulted in greater connection. Others have been marginalized or worse off, even if some countries and people have gained great advantages.
The first factor to think about is how globalization has caused income concentration. The revenues sometimes gather in a small number as companies increase their worldwide presence. Multinational companies with enormous assets and markets show this focus. Over 70% of the world’s wealth is held by only ten percent of the population, according to a United Nations study. This tendency has repercussions for social mobility and economic strength since the affluent may sway legislation to serve their needs, therefore continuing a cycle of disparity. Another factor to consider is the effect of globalization on labor markets. Many times, businesses have used labor in developing nations to maximize profit margins. Local laborers often face low wages and terrible working conditions under this method. One of the best illustrations is the garment industry in many developing countries, where Western markets get minimal compensation from employees who work under dangerous circumstances. Though globalization generates work, it also fuels a race to the bottom whereby employees are pitted against one other worldwide, therefore worsening injustice between and within countries.
Furthermore globalization has greatly impacted education and vocational growth. Particularly in technologically driven industries, high-skilled employees have gained from rising demand for their abilities. Low-skilled employees, on the other hand, sometimes end up in precarious circumstances with limited possibility for growth. Almost 1. 6 billion persons work in informal jobs lacking safety and benefits, according to a study by the International Labor Organization. This disparity in educational access and job prospects helps to sustain current social hierarchies and restricts upward mobility for many. Understanding of the impact of globalization on inequality becomes more nuanced when seen in historical context. The late 20th century saw an era of quick globalization marked by neoliberal policies promoting free trade and deregulation. Emphasizing that free markets might result in higher living standards, leading economists like Milton Friedman supported these ideas. Still, their advocacy frequently missed the effects on at-risk groups. The creation of the World Trade Organization in 1995 and later trade accords helped developed nations, hence worsening the problems for less developed countries trying to compete on unequal ground.
Importantly, there are varying perspectives on the relationship between globalization and inequality. Some argue that globalization has led to economic growth overall, lifting millions out of poverty. Nations like China and India have experienced remarkable economic advancements following their integration into the global economy. However, this growth has not been evenly distributed, leading to regional disparities. In China, the coastal areas benefit from trade and investment, while rural regions lag behind, fostering a sense of inequality.
To illustrate this further, consider the 2020 pandemic’s impact on global economies. COVID-19 highlighted and exacerbated existing inequalities. Wealthy nations quickly secured vaccines, while poorer countries struggled to access them. The Global Database launched by the World Bank indicated that the pandemic could push over 100 million people back into extreme poverty, reaffirming how globalization can result in inequitable outcomes in times of crisis.
Looking towards the future, potential developments may shape the ongoing discussion of globalization and inequality. The rise of digital economies presents both opportunities and challenges. While remote work and digital platforms can help bridge divides, they may also reinforce existing inequalities if access to technology and education remains limited. Policymakers have a crucial role in ensuring that globalization benefits all, advocating for fair trade practices, equitable access to resources, and labor protections for vulnerable workers.
In conclusion, globalization both worsens and doubles its role in promoting inequality. Though it has promoted connectivity and economic expansion, its advantages have not been fairly shared. The complexity of this phenomenon is highlighted by wealth concentration, labor market effects, educational inequalities, and continuous historical influences. Policymakers and society as a whole must grasp how globalization affects inequality if they want to negotiate future obstacles. Only by means of proactive actions can we aim for a more just worldwide scene that welcomes the promise of globalization while tackling its intrinsic inequalities.
Reference
Unknown Author (n.d.). Untitled. http://www.researchgate.net. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377524265_Globalization_and_Income_Inequality_in_Developing_Economies_A_Comprehensive_Analysis
Juan Ariel Bogliaccini (2013). Trade Liberalization, Deindustrialization, and Inequality: Evidence from Middle-Income Latin American Countries | Latin American Research Review | Cambridge Core. http://www.cambridge.org. Retrieved from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-research-review/article/trade-liberalization-deindustrialization-and-inequality-evidence-from-middleincome-latin-american-countries/3BBAE21D868640FB3731FA456C3C5F5C
Unknown Author (n.d.). Untitled. trace.tennessee.edu. Retrieved from https://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7098&context=utk_graddiss
M Asher Lawson & Shai Davidai & Daniela Goya-Tocchetto (2024). Economic segregation is associated with reduced concerns about economic inequality – PMC. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11226429/
Tariq Aljuneidi & Shahid Ahmad Bhat & Youssef Boulaksil (2023). A comprehensive systematic review of the literature on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on supply chains – ScienceDirect. http://www.sciencedirect.com. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949863523000249
Ning Ma & Michal Wojewodzki & Yanrui Wu & Tsun Se Cheong (2021). The Impacts of Globalization on Inequality in the Post-COVID-19 World: Evidence From China – PMC. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8666690/
Krzysztof Drachal & Mosab I. Tabash & Abdullah & Yasmeen & Drachal & Hamadi & Krzysztof & Abdullah Hamadi & Elsantil & Tabash & Yasmeen Elsantil (2024). Globalization and Income Inequality in Developing Economies: A Comprehensive Analysis. http://www.mdpi.com. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/12/1/23
Step to Light 